Who qualifies for a hair relaxer lawsuit and potential compensation? Understand eligibility criteria and your chances for a claim.
Distinguished Professor at Harvard Law
Every day, millions of individuals rely on hair relaxer products to manage their hair, trusting in their safety. However, recent scientific findings and numerous lawsuits have shattered this trust, revealing a potential link between these products and severe health issues, including uterine and ovarian cancer.
This alarming revelation has led to a surge of hair relaxer lawsuits, with victims seeking justice and compensation for their suffering. If you or a loved one has been affected, you may be entitled to significant compensation.
This article is designed to guide you through the complex landscape of these lawsuits, provide important information about your rights, and how the expert team at ConsumerShield can help you navigate this legal journey.
There are numerous ongoing lawsuits across the United States in relation to hair relaxers. Here’s some important facts in regards to hair relaxer lawsuits:
Attorneys representing plaintiffs in the hair relaxer Multi-District Litigation (MDL) are petitioning the court for an 11% holdback from the compensation awarded to plaintiffs. This proposed figure is substantial, reflecting the significant efforts and resources invested by the legal teams in the case.
During Friday's status conference for the hair relaxer class action MDL, overseen by Judge Mary M. Rowland in Illinois, several important developments emerged:
New Briefing Schedule: Judge Rowland requested the parties to establish a consensus on a revised briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, with a deadline set for November 28, 2023.
Science Day Scheduling Conflict: There is ongoing contention regarding the scheduling of Science Day. Parties are required to present their arguments in cross briefs by December 6, 2023.
Case Management Order (CMO) Progress: The parties are actively collaborating on a CMO concerning the Plaintiffs’ Fact Sheets and Records Authorizations and will notify the court upon its finalization.
Update on State Court Lawsuits: Defendants provided an update on similar lawsuits in state courts, though no specific court action was requested.
Document Production for International Sales: For products sold outside the U.S., cross briefs are due by December 6, 2023. Additionally, Revlon is required to clarify its discovery stance by November 27, 2023.
Document Production Deadlines: Revlon must respond to two Requests for Production by December 15, 2023. Similarly, Avalon is expected to provide a complete ingredient list in response to the Plaintiffs’ Interrogatory 6 by the same date.
ESI Discovery Referred to Magistrate Judge: The court has referred all Electronic Stored Information (ESI) discovery and related disputes to Magistrate Judge Finnegan, without mandating the defendants to reveal all systems used during the relevant timeframe.
The hair relaxer class action Multi-District Litigation (MDL) has experienced a dramatic increase in case volume, now approaching nearly 8,000 pending cases. In the last month alone, an additional 2,000 cases were added to the MDL. This surge in litigation activity has seen an average of around 500 new cases being filed each week since the end of August, marking a significant escalation from just 21 cases recorded back in February. This rapid growth underscores the expanding reach and intensifying nature of the legal proceedings in this MDL.
Judge Mary Rowland has delivered a significant ruling in the ongoing class action lawsuit against major hair relaxer manufacturers. Contrary to the defendants' expectations, the MDL judge has rejected their motion to dismiss, particularly dismissing their preemption argument. This decision affirms that federal law does not override the plaintiffs' state law claims, including those pertaining to negligence and product liability.
Although the court did dismiss the fraud claims for not meeting the specificity required by Rule 9(b), it has allowed the progression of claims related to unfair practices. Notably, the potential for punitive damages remains a part of the lawsuit, significantly influencing its settlement value. Additionally, claims under state law warranties and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act have been deemed sufficient to proceed. This ruling marks a crucial victory, reinforcing the momentum of the litigation as it moves forward.
In the ongoing hair relaxer litigation, the leadership team has proposed an 11% deduction from the gross settlement or verdict amount in every case associated with the hair relaxer lawsuits. This proposed holdback is structured with two distinct allocations: 8% is intended to cover the costs of common benefit work undertaken by the attorneys, and the remaining 3% is aimed at reimbursing expenses incurred for the same. While this proposal raises questions about the appropriateness of the percentage being earmarked, it's important to clarify that this deduction impacts only the portion of the fees that go to the lawyers spearheading the litigation. It does not affect the actual compensation amount that plaintiffs will receive for their individual hair relaxer cancer claims.
In light of the surge in cancer lawsuits linked to hair relaxers, the FDA has stepped forward with a proposal to outlaw formaldehyde in all hair relaxing products. Historically prevalent in numerous hair straightening formulations, formaldehyde is recognized for its toxicity and potential to induce various cancers, leukemia included. It's crucial to note, though, that formaldehyde hasn't been connected to ovarian or uterine cancers, the primary focus of the current wave of hair relaxer litigation.
The momentum is building in the hair relaxer class action arena, confirming our initial projections. An astounding 3,752 new cases were introduced to the MDL over the past month alone, escalating the current tally of ongoing lawsuits within the hair relaxer MDL to 5,996. This surge is particularly striking when considering that back in June 2023, the figure hovered at under 200 pending cases.
In the recent MDL status conference, Judge Rowland delivered her decisions on a series of contested discovery issues, primarily ruling in the plaintiffs' favor. Her directives included mandating the defendants to furnish documents beyond their immediate physical possession and dismissing their resistance to disclosing materials related to patents. Conversely, the sole resolution favoring the defendants was the denial of the plaintiffs' demand for litigation hold letters. The judge has set a strict deadline of November 23, 2023, for the submission of the disputed documents.
As the hair relaxer class action continues to explode with new cases, a major early discovery battle appears to be developing between the plaintiffs and the defendants. Last week, all of the hair relaxer defendants jointly submitted a brief to the MDL Judge detailing various discovery disputes and issues that have arisen. The joint submission details various complaints that the defense has with the discovery requests propounded by the plaintiffs. In short, the defendants are complaining that the plaintiffs are asking for everything under the sun. The issues will be addressed at the MDL status conference set for today.
In February 2023, there were 24 new cases filed in federal courts, with most filed in the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuits allege that hair relaxer products caused various health issues, including cancer.
Since the start of February, 11 more hair relaxer product liability lawsuits have been filed in federal courts. Seven of the cases were filed in the Northern District of Illinois. The remaining four were filed in districts nationwide but will all be transferred into the new hair relaxer class action MDL.
In the same month, a class action lawsuit was formed, consolidating multiple individual cases. This will allow plaintiffs to combine their efforts and resources to take on the large corporations involved in the manufacture and distribution of hair relaxer products.
A new lawsuit was filed in Missouri against several companies alleging that their hair care products led to regular and prolonged exposure to phthalates and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals. The plaintiff worked in a hair salon and was diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma a few months prior to the filing of the lawsuit.
This early case was filed in federal court in Chicago by Jenny Mitchell, a Missouri resident who used chemical hair relaxers her entire life. She started using hair relaxers at 10 years old and was diagnosed with uterine cancer at the age of 28. This was one of the first cases to allege that the manufacturers knew or should have known that the chemicals in their products could increase the risk of uterine cancer.
These ongoing lawsuits are representative of the larger hair relaxer class action lawsuit, and serve to highlight the serious and widespread nature of the health issues alleged.
With the help of professionals such as the team at ConsumerShield, victims can join these lawsuits and seek the justice they deserve.
Stay up to date
Get updates on all of our lawsuits, news, articles, research and lawsuit updates.
As the seriousness of the health risks associated with hair relaxer products becomes increasingly evident, many victims are stepping forward to seek legal recourse. But who exactly is eligible to file a hair relaxer lawsuit?
Primarily, any individual who has regularly used hair relaxer products and has subsequently been diagnosed with a serious health condition, such as uterine or ovarian cancer, may be eligible to participate in a hair relaxer compensation case. The use of hair relaxer products should be frequent and over an extended period, reflecting the long-term exposure indicated in the scientific studies.
In addition to the victims themselves, families of victims who have lost their lives due to these health complications may also be eligible to file a lawsuit. These cases, often referred to as wrongful death lawsuits, seek to compensate for the emotional pain and suffering of losing a loved one, funeral expenses, and the loss of financial support if the victim was a primary breadwinner.
However, it's important to note that eligibility is not solely determined by the presence of a relevant health condition and the usage of hair relaxer products. The timing of the lawsuit also plays a crucial role due to the statute of limitations, which sets a deadline for filing a lawsuit. The period can vary by state, ranging from 2 to 6 years from the date of diagnosis or the date when the victim should have reasonably discovered the link between their health condition and hair relaxer usage.
The legal landscape around hair relaxer products and their potential health risks is complex and continually evolving. This is where ConsumerShield can provide invaluable assistance. As experts in the field, we can help determine your eligibility, guide you through the process, and fight for the justice you deserve.
Remember, if you have suffered due to the use of hair relaxer products, you are not alone, and legal recourse is available. With expert guidance and a strong case, you can take on the manufacturers and seek the compensation you deserve for your suffering.
Filing a hair relaxer lawsuit can be a complex and daunting process, especially when you're dealing with the physical and emotional toll of a serious health condition. But with ConsumerShield, the journey to justice becomes significantly more manageable.
We're here to offer our expertise and guide you every step of the way.
At ConsumerShield, we understand that no amount of money can truly compensate for the pain and suffering caused by the health risks associated with hair relaxer products. However, by filing a hair relaxer lawsuit, you can secure financial compensation that can help cover medical bills, lost wages, and other expenses.
Remember, you don't have to navigate this legal journey alone. You just need to make the first move and reach out to us.
Contact ConsumerShield today, and let's start your journey towards justice.
We are working with thousands of amazing partners.
As victims of the harmful effects of hair relaxer products seek justice, questions around compensation and settlements inevitably arise. While it's too early to predict specific settlement amounts for hair relaxer compensation claims, we can make some informed estimations based on the severity of injuries, evidence of causation, and previous similar cases.
The potential settlement value of a hair relaxer lawsuit depends significantly on the primary injury sustained and the strength of the causation evidence supporting the claim. Severe or life-threatening conditions generally result in higher settlements than non-fatal ones. For instance, a lawsuit involving a uterine cancer diagnosis could potentially yield a higher settlement than a case involving fibroids, given the fatal potential of uterine cancer.
It's important to note that the ongoing Multi-District Litigation (MDL) could significantly impact the potential settlement value for hair relaxer cases. As the litigation is still in the early stages, the outcomes of these consolidated cases could set a precedent for future individual lawsuits and influence settlement amounts.
However, based on past product liability cases and our extensive legal experience, our attorneys at ConsumerShield estimate that hair relaxer lawsuit settlement amounts could potentially range from $100,000 to $500,000 or more. These figures depend heavily on the primary injury named in the hair relaxer lawsuit and the strength of the evidence connecting the injury to the use of hair relaxer products.
We predict that the victims in the top settlement tier will be women diagnosed with uterine cancer during their ideal childbearing years. The devastating impact on their fertility could significantly increase the potential settlement amounts in these cases.
While these estimates provide a general idea, each hair relaxer lawsuit is unique, with its specific circumstances, injuries, and impacts. At ConsumerShield, we are committed to finding the right representation for the maximum compensation possible in every case we handle.
Remember, the potential settlement payout for a hair relaxer lawsuit could be higher for conditions with strong causation evidence linking them to toxic hair products.
If you or a loved one has suffered health issues after using hair relaxer products, don't hesitate to seek legal advice. Contact ConsumerShield today, and let our expert team guide you through this complex legal journey towards justice and compensation.
As of mid-2023, hair relaxer lawsuits are gaining momentum. Several cases have been filed in federal courts across the United States, alleging that the use of hair relaxer products has led to serious health issues such as uterine and ovarian cancer. A significant development is the formation of a Multi-District Litigation (MDL), which consolidates multiple individual cases, providing a unified legal front against the manufacturers.
Scientific studies have found a strong association between long-term use of hair relaxers and increased rates of uterine and ovarian cancer. The main concern lies with the chemical Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), an endocrine-disrupting chemical found in hair relaxers, which can cause significant adverse health effects, including developmental abnormalities, reproductive dysfunction, and infertility.
Any individual who has regularly used hair relaxer products and has subsequently been diagnosed with a serious health condition, such as uterine or ovarian cancer, may be eligible to participate in a hair relaxer compensation case. Additionally, families of victims who have lost their lives due to these health complications may also be eligible to file a lawsuit.
The legal process begins with a consultation with a law firm like ConsumerShield, which specializes in product liability cases. If you are eligible, our team will help file your lawsuit.
While it's too early to predict specific settlement amounts, based on past product liability cases, our attorneys estimate that hair relaxer lawsuit settlement amounts could range from $100,000 to $500,000 or more. Compensation can cover medical expenses, loss of earnings, pain and suffering, and in some cases, punitive damages.
A law firm like ConsumerShield can provide invaluable assistance in a hair relaxer lawsuit and can help determine your eligibility by guiding you through the filing process.
The statute of limitations can vary by state, ranging from 2 to 6 years from the date of diagnosis or the date when the victim should have reasonably discovered the link between their health condition and hair relaxer usage. It's crucial to act swiftly to ensure your lawsuit is filed within the required time frame.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with uterine or ovarian cancer after regular use of hair relaxers, you may be entitled to compensation. At ConsumerShield, we understand the pain and trauma you're going through. Our experienced team is ready to fight for your rights and secure the compensation you deserve in this hair relaxer class action lawsuit.
Don't miss out on the opportunity to claim what you're entitled to. The time to act is now. Contact ConsumerShield today, and let's start your hair relaxer injury claim together.
You are not alone in this fight.
Stay up to date
Get updates on all of our lawsuits, news, articles, research and lawsuit updates.
Experience a streamlined and timely legal process that ensures your lawsuit stays on track and progresses efficiently.
Our relentless advocacy is focused on securing the highest possible compensation for individuals impacted.
Count on our unwavering commitment to prioritize what's best for people affected, ensuring their rights and interests are safeguarded.