Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit: 2023 December Updates, Payouts & Criteria

For many individuals, these machines are a lifeline, essential for managing conditions like sleep apnea and ensuring uninterrupted breathing during sleep. The discovery of potential carcinogen and toxic chemical exposure from these devices has understandably led to distress, fear, and anger among users.

This comprehensive guide aims to shed light on the ongoing Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit, breaking down the complex legalities into understandable insights. From the origins of the recall to the symptoms indicating exposure, potential compensation avenues, and the current status of the lawsuit – we aim to equip you with all the information you need. Moreover, in this challenging time, services like ConsumerShield emerge as beacons of hope, offering affected users a platform for free claim reviews and connecting them with competent legal teams ready to advocate for their rights.

As you navigate this guide, remember that while the situation is concerning, you are not alone. Many individuals and organizations, including ConsumerShield, are tirelessly working to ensure that the voices of affected users are heard, and justice is served.

Apply for Philips CPAP Lawsuit now!

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Lawsuits shown in:
CBS CNN FOX New York Times


Philips CPAP Lawsuit Updates and News

You can follow the FDA Safety Communication regarding Philips CPAP lawsuit updates and developments:

  1. The CPAP litigation is steadily moving forward, though the pace reflects the complexities typical of mass tort cases. Key upcoming deadlines include:

    • Feb 16, 2024: Mediator's report on personal injury settlement mediations.
    • Apr 30, 2024: End of general causation fact discovery.
    • May 30, 2024: Plaintiffs' expert disclosures on general causation.
    • Jul 30, 2024: Defendants' expert disclosures on general causation and end of common fact discovery.
    • Aug 30, 2024: Submission of bellwether case selection proposals and plaintiffs’ rebuttal expert disclosures.
    • Oct 30, 2024: Completion of expert depositions on general causation.
    • Dec 2, 2024: Deadline for Rule 702/Daubert motions on general causation experts.
    • Jan 17, 2025: Opposition deadline for Rule 702/Daubert motions.
    • Feb 18, 2025: Reply brief deadline for Rule 702/Daubert motions.
    • Mar/Apr 2025: Potential hearing date for Rule 702/Daubert motions.

    Given this timeline, the first CPAP trial is expected in mid to late 2025. While the duration of such mass tort cases can be disheartening, there's hope that Philips will fulfill its commitment to propose reasonable settlements in 2023, potentially resolving many claims ahead of trial. The effectiveness of this strategy remains to be seen.

  2. In a surprising turn of events, the Philips CPAP recall class action Multi-District Litigation (MDL), which has been gradually progressing and expanding by approximately 50 new cases monthly, experienced a decline in case numbers this month. Contrary to the previously observed growth trend that led to an over 300% increase this year, the MDL saw a reduction of 42 cases, bringing the current total of pending cases down to 742. The reason behind this unexpected decrease in case count remains unclear, marking a notable deviation from the MDL's previous trajectory.

  3. In the ongoing litigation surrounding Philips' CPAP devices, the company had previously attempted to mitigate legal pressures by filing a motion to dismiss various claims raised by plaintiffs. Last month, the appointed Special Master in the case delivered a Report and Recommendation to the presiding MDL Judge, asserting that Philips’ dismissal motion lacks substantiation and should be rejected.

    Recently, Philips has countered with an Objection to the Special Master's Recommendations, persisting in their argument that certain plaintiff claims are unfounded and should be dropped. Despite this challenge, expectations are that the Judge will likely concur with the Special Master's initial assessment, indicating a continuation of the legal battle for Philips without the dismissal of any claims.

  4. In an unexpected turn, Philips is facing another product recall. This time, it's their Respironics division's V60 and V60 Plus Ventilators that are under scrutiny. The FDA has identified a defect in the Power Management Printed Circuit Board Assemblies of these devices. This recall affects a total of nine ventilators: eight distributed within the US and one in the Philippines. The flawed components originated from an external warehouse. Fortunately, no injuries or deaths have been reported in relation to this issue, contrasting with the more severe concerns related to the CPAP machine recall previously highlighted on this platform.

  5. Following our September 7th report on the CPAP class action lawsuit settlement concerning consumer claims, additional information has surfaced regarding the compensation methodology for victims. Philips has pledged to allocate no less than $479 million for this settlement, benefiting both direct purchasers of the implicated respiratory devices and insurance providers who executed reimbursements.

    Recall-affected consumers can anticipate compensation amounts between $56 and $1,552, plus an extra $100 incentive for returning the recalled units. The settlement has received preliminary approval from Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, with a conclusive hearing slated for April 11, 2024. Legal fees and lawsuit expenses, amounting to $95 million, are being pursued by the plaintiffs' attorneys within this settlement framework.

    While this development primarily pertains to consumer claims, it's tangential to the personal injury and fatality lawsuits we are actively pursuing. Nonetheless, Philips' inclination towards settlement suggests an aversion to trial, potentially prefacing a comprehensive settlement offer for all outstanding claims.

  6. In a recent development within the CPAP recall MDL, both sides have collaboratively submitted a joint motion seeking the Court's approval for revisions to the Plaintiff Fact Sheets (PFS) required from all new plaintiffs entering the MDL. These proposed alterations are designed to streamline the data collection process, facilitating more effective ranking and categorization of incoming personal injury plaintiffs.

  7. A new Case Management Order introduced revised scheduling deadlines. The admissibility of expert testimony challenges is set for August 2024, with a hearing in February 2025, indicating a potential long duration for the MDL.

  8. A significant surge in CPAP lawsuits was noted, with 125 new cases added to the MDL, bringing the active total to 673. This month also highlighted the contrast between injury and medical monitoring claims. Philips contested the latter, citing a lack of evidence for prolonged exposure risks from device foam toxins. The broader MDL, rooted in Pittsburgh, includes diverse claims ranging from economic losses to long-term health monitoring. As the legal landscape evolves, Philips has reserved $633.17 million for potential settlements, suggesting a strategic approach to funds allocation.

  9. The class action MDL saw the addition of 30 new injury lawsuits, reaching a total of 548 cases. Potential claimants were also reminded of the critical June 14 deadline, marking two years since the Philips CPAP recall announcement.

  10. The month witnessed varying activity, from Philips settling a $62 million issue regarding sales practices in China, to a significant rise in the number of new CPAP recall lawsuits in March and a decline in April. Another highlight was the case of Deidra Jackson Holmes, filed directly in the MDL, alleging that her recalled CPAP machine caused her multiple health complications.

  11. Philips continued facing challenges with the Dreamstation CPAP and BiPAP, as the FDA announced a Class I recall for certain refurbished devices. Philips CEO Roy Jakobs expressed hope for settlements with those seeking reimbursement in consumer class action lawsuits within the year, while injury settlements are anticipated next year.

  12. Legal developments included Philips' motion to dismiss the CPAP lawsuits, a move believed by many to have little chance of success.

  13. The FDA released updated data, revealing that 98,000 adverse health incident reports related to recalled CPAP devices had been received, with 350 reported fatalities.

  14. Philips announced a reduction of over 6,000 jobs following its struggles post-recall. In the legal arena, lawyers on both sides of the CPAP recall MDL proposed different case management strategies, with plaintiffs pushing for a trial in mid-2024 and the defense aiming for 2025 or later.

Stay up to date

Get updates on all of our lawsuits, news, articles, research and lawsuit updates.

Introduction to the Philips CPAP Recall

Philips CPAP Lawsuit
Philips CPAP Lawsuit

When it comes to medical devices, Philips has long been viewed as a hallmark of reliability and innovation. However, the trust that both medical professionals and patients placed in this brand faced a severe test with the recent recall of their CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator machines. The core issue? Concerns about the degradation of a sound abatement foam used in these devices, which could lead to potential exposure to toxic chemicals and carcinogens.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machines, along with their counterpart, BiPAP machines, play a pivotal role in the lives of those diagnosed with sleep apnea and other respiratory conditions. These devices ensure that patients can breathe freely and sleep soundly, significantly improving their quality of life. It's easy to understand, then, the magnitude of concern and anxiety that arose when reports emerged about potential health risks associated with these critical machines.

The fallout from the recall was immediate and extensive. Many users reported symptoms and health issues they believed to be connected to the devices. The medical community sought clarity on the situation, and legal professionals prepared to hold Philips accountable.

Amidst this turmoil, services like ConsumerShield stepped forward, offering a beacon of hope and assistance to affected users. By providing free claim reviews, ConsumerShield ensured that potential victims could explore their rights and get connected with legal experts equipped to handle their cases.

In essence, the Philips CPAP recall isn't just about a faulty medical device; it's about the trust users place in manufacturers to prioritize their health and safety. It's a wake-up call for stricter quality controls, better transparency, and a reminder of the importance of accountability in the medical equipment industry.

What symptoms indicate exposure to CPAP foam?

For countless individuals relying on Philips CPAP and BiPAP machines, understanding the potential risks and recognizing the signs of exposure to the degraded foam has become paramount.

The sound abatement foam, designed to reduce noise and vibrations in the machine, has been identified as the main culprit behind the recall. As this foam breaks down, it can release particles and gasses that users might inadvertently inhale or ingest, posing a range of health concerns.

Key Symptoms of Exposure:

  • Breathing Difficulties: One of the most immediate and concerning symptoms users reported is trouble breathing. This can range from shortness of breath to more severe respiratory complications. Given that these machines are specifically designed to aid breathing, any respiratory issues experienced while using them should be taken very seriously.
  • Headaches: Persistent and unusual headaches, particularly those that develop after using the CPAP or BiPAP machine, can be an indicator of exposure to the degraded foam's harmful substances.
  • Dizziness: Some users have reported feeling dizzy or lightheaded, especially after waking up. This symptom might be linked to the inhalation of toxic chemicals released by the foam.
  • Other Related Medical Complications: Beyond the primary symptoms, users should be vigilant about other potential health issues, such as skin, eye, and throat irritation, nausea, or even systemic reactions. Each individual's response can vary, making it essential to monitor any unusual health changes closely.

If you suspect you've been exposed to harmful substances from a Philips CPAP or BiPAP machine, the first step is to seek medical advice immediately. Documenting your symptoms and any medical interventions can be crucial for your health and any potential legal actions you might consider.

In this challenging landscape, ConsumerShield offers a valuable resource for affected individuals. By providing free claim reviews, they connect users with legal experts who can provide guidance, ensuring victims' rights are upheld and they receive the support they need.

Who Qualifies for the CPAP Class Action Lawsuit?

With the Philips CPAP recall capturing headlines and affecting millions, there's a growing need for clarity around who might be eligible to join the class action lawsuit.

A class action lawsuit is a legal action where a group of people, who have suffered similar harm by the same entity, collectively bring a claim to court. In the case of the Philips CPAP recall, the harm is believed to be caused by potential carcinogen and toxic chemical exposure from the devices.

Criteria for Qualification:

  • Ownership of a Recalled Device: The primary qualification criterion is the ownership or use of a recalled Philips CPAP, BiPAP, or ventilator machine. It's crucial to verify the model and brand of your device.
  • Documented Health Issues: Having medical records indicating health complications or symptoms believed to be linked to the device can strengthen a claim. These might include cancer, lung problems, breathing difficulties, or other related injuries.
  • Usage Duration: The length of time a patient used the device could play a role in eligibility. Those who used the device for extended periods might have a higher risk of exposure and subsequently a stronger claim.
  • Retaining the Device: Keeping the recalled device can be essential. It might be used as evidence, especially if testing is required to determine the presence of harmful chemicals.
  • Timeliness: Legal actions are bound by statutes of limitations, which means claims need to be filed within a specific timeframe from when the injury was discovered or should have been discovered.

If you believe you might qualify but are uncertain about the specifics or the strength of your potential claim, ConsumerShield offers invaluable assistance. Their free claim review service provides clarity for potential victims, assessing the merit of their claims and guiding them on the next steps. Through ConsumerShield, affected individuals can also connect with expert legal teams who can advise them further and represent their interests in the lawsuit.


We are working with thousands of amazing partners.

“Never imagined that understanding complex legal issues could be so easy. The Consumer Shield demystified everything for me.”

Roundup Lawsuit Participant

“As someone who was completely new to the world of lawsuits, The Consumer Shield provided the perfect starting point and direction.”

Roundup Lawsuit Participant

“Drowning in legalities, The Consumer Shield was the lifeline I didn't know I needed. Now, I'm well-informed and ready to take action.”

Aware Individual

“Feeling lost and uninformed, The Consumer Shield was a beacon of information. I finally understood my rights and potential legal actions.”

Family Member of a talcum powder victim

“Navigating potential lawsuits felt daunting, but The Consumer Shield provided the clarity and information I desperately needed.”

Tylenol Lawsuit Participant

“Legal processes always seemed foreign and intimidating. Thanks to The Consumer Shield, I feel like I've taken a masterclass in understanding my rights.”

Paraquat Lawsuit Participant

When will the CPAP lawsuit be settled?

The Philips CPAP recall has spawned a legal storm, with countless lawsuits being filed against the company. For those affected, and for observers watching the proceedings unfold, a key question lingers: When will this be resolved?

Factors Influencing the Timeline:

  • Complexity and Volume of Cases: The sheer volume of cases, combined with the complexity of the claims, means that this legal battle could stretch out for some time. Many of these lawsuits have been consolidated into a multi-district litigation (MDL) to streamline proceedings, but this doesn't necessarily expedite a settlement.
  • Company's Stance: As of recent updates, Philips has indicated its intention to defend these claims robustly. A company's willingness to settle versus its readiness to fight in court can significantly impact the timeline.
  • Nature of Legal Proceedings: Legal battles, especially those of this magnitude, involve extensive evidence gathering, expert testimonies, and legal maneuverings. Each stage can be time-consuming.
  • Previous Settlements: While Philips has settled some claims as of September 2022, this doesn't provide a definitive timeline for all ongoing cases. Every claim is unique, and while some might reach a settlement quickly, others could take years.
  • External Factors: External factors, such as global events, economic conditions, or even changes in leadership within the company, can influence the pace of legal proceedings.

For those directly impacted by the recall, the wait can be anxiety-inducing. However, it's essential to understand that legal processes, especially ones of this scale, require patience. Staying informed and engaged with your legal representation ensures you're best positioned for a favorable outcome.

ConsumerShield plays a crucial role during this waiting period. They offer continuous updates and insights, ensuring that victims and their families are not left in the dark. Their commitment to guiding affected individuals through this challenging time is unwavering, making them a trusted ally in the fight for justice.

How Can ConsumerShield Help?

At ConsumerShield, we are committed to supporting victims of Philips CPAP machine malfunctions. We provide free claim evaluations to ascertain your eligibility for compensation.

Our devoted team links you with seasoned legal experts who can navigate the complexities of the CPAP lawsuit on your behalf.

Here's a simple guide to beginning your journey with ConsumerShield for the CPAP lawsuit:

Step 1: Complete the Online Form

Begin by visiting the ConsumerShield website and filling out the specified form here. This form allows you to provide preliminary details about your case, such as the issues you've encountered, any related medical treatments, and the overall impact on your well-being. Once you've submitted the form, a member from our intake team or a representative from a partnering law firm will promptly contact you to discuss the next stages.

Step 2: Free Claim Review

Following our first interaction, our professionals will conduct an in-depth claim evaluation at no cost to you. During this step, we'll delve deeper into your situation to evaluate the strength and potential value of your claim. We're available to answer any questions you may have, ensuring you're fully informed about what lies ahead. This review is crucial in establishing your eligibility to move forward with a CPAP lawsuit.

Step 3: Advocate for the Justice You Deserve

Once we've collected all essential details and verified your eligibility for the lawsuit, our extensive network of experienced attorneys and medical experts will be at your disposal. Leveraging their expertise—gained from winning significant compensations for individuals in similar situations—they will advocate fiercely on your behalf. They'll handle the legal nuances, allowing you to focus on your recovery and overall well-being.

You don't have to face this alone; allow us to assist you in seeking the justice you rightfully deserve.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Yes, CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machines are FDA-approved. Before being released to the market, CPAP manufacturers must meet the FDA's safety and effectiveness standards. It's essential to note, however, that while the machines are FDA-approved, recalls can still occur if safety concerns arise post-market, as was the case with certain Philips CPAP machines.

  • The primary brand at the center of the current CPAP lawsuit is Philips, specifically their CPAP, BiPAP, and certain ventilator machines. The lawsuit revolves around concerns that a sound abatement foam used in these devices might degrade and release potential carcinogens or toxic chemicals, posing health risks to users.

  • If you believe you've been affected by a recalled CPAP machine:

    • Stop Using the Machine: Consult with your healthcare provider about alternative treatments or devices.
    • Seek Medical Advice: If you've experienced symptoms or health issues you believe are related to the machine, see a doctor immediately.
    • Document Everything: Maintain records of your device, its usage, any medical treatments, and related expenses.
    • Contact a Lawyer or Claim Service: Services like ConsumerShield offer free claim reviews to help determine your eligibility for compensation and connect you with legal teams.
    • Stay Updated: Keep abreast of news and updates regarding the lawsuit to ensure you're informed of any developments.
  • The exact value of the CPAP lawsuit can vary based on individual claims, the severity of injuries, and the specific circumstances of each case. As of recent updates, Philips has set aside substantial funds to address the legal claims and settlements related to the recall. Individual compensation might cover medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more. The lawsuit's total worth will likely be determined as cases progress and settlements are reached.

The Consumer Shield is Here to Help You

Apply for Philips CPAP Lawsuit now!

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Other Defective Product Lawsuits

Stay up to date

Get updates on all of our lawsuits, news, articles, research and lawsuit updates.

Our goals

Efficient Legal Process: Streamline Your Case

Experience a streamlined and timely legal process that ensures your lawsuit stays on track and progresses efficiently.

Maximize Your Compensation: Our Dedicated Advocacy

Our relentless advocacy is focused on securing the highest possible compensation for individuals impacted.

People-Centric Approach: Your Interests Come First

Count on our unwavering commitment to prioritize what's best for people affected, ensuring their rights and interests are safeguarded.